<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>LRC, Houston - An Evolving Spiritual Community &#187; Religious Myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/category/religious-myths/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lrchouston.com</link>
	<description>LRC, Houston - An Evolving Spiritual Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:34:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<copyright>2006-2009 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>ernie@lrchouston.com (LRC, Ernie Fitzpatrick)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>ernie@lrchouston.com (LRC, Ernie Fitzpatrick)</webMaster>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:new-feed-url>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/category/podcasts/feed</itunes:new-feed-url>
	<itunes:subtitle>LRC is the weekends-free church in Houston, Texas.  Join us for a weekly journey into authentic spirituality.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>LRC, Houston - the weekends-free church in Houston, Texas</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>LRC, church, Houston, Ernie Fitzpatrick</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality" />
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Christianity" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Spirituality" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>LRC, Ernie Fitzpatrick</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>LRC, Ernie Fitzpatrick</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>ernie@lrchouston.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.lrchouston.com/audio/podcast300.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title># 47- Jesus Did Not Die!</title>
		<link>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/47-jesus-did-not-die.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/47-jesus-did-not-die.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/47-jesus-did-not-die.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Jesus did not die (which is the first misconception) then Jesus did not die for my sins. While the church might scratch it&#8217;s metaphorical head on my first statement, it would take my head off for the second statement. Killing someone (in the name of God) is LOVE of course. Since I believe in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If <strong>Jesus did not die </strong>(which is the first misconception) then Jesus did not die for my sins. While the church might scratch it&#8217;s metaphorical head on my first statement, it would take my head off for the second statement. Killing someone (in the name of God) is LOVE of course. Since I believe in <strong>original blessing </strong>and not original sin, I&#8217;ve automatically reduced the need for an ancient Old Testament sacrifice that Christianity adopted.  We simply must get over and past the scrificial blood demanding paradigms.  <span id="more-1304"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense#articles--></p>
<p>Embracing life within the Christian community and not seeing the need for Jesus to be &#8220;<strong>sent to die for my sins</strong>&#8221; is tatamount to radical heretical synthesis. But, let me get back to my primary point which may help explain the secondary one- if possible. Remember, one has to &#8220;<em>suspend DISBELIEF in order to BELIEVE</em>&#8220;. If we could only comprehend that <a href="http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/the-trance-of-separation.php#more-924">we are ONE and we are not separated from our Source</a>! Death cannot separate us because there really is no death!</p>
<p>Jesus did not die!</p>
<p>Neither was there a reversal of death (neither resusitation, nor resurrection). </p>
<p>Simply stated Jesus just transitioned His state of consciousness. He de-materialized His more dense state (we are dense in many ways!) and reappeared in a lighter state. And then once He had demonstrated a higher resonating vibratory pitch, He transitioned once more into the pure light frequency that took Him back to the Source from which we all came, and to which we are all headed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/38-religion-need-not-be-mediated.php#more-966">Religion need not be mediated</a>, at least not the way the modern-day church goes about it! We do all need a spiritual community though.</p>
<p>The challenge and question is simply how REAL can we be here in this third dimension? How much of a higher, more true resonance of our &#8220;angels of light&#8221; that we are can we attain while in these dense matter bodies that we inhabit. Jesus showed us that we have a CHOICE. We have FREE WILL. Ledt me use the words of Greg Braden who said, &#8220;Jesus, the Christ demonstrated that there is NO JUDGMENT from creation itself against any one individual for actions or deeds resulting from the  use of CHOCIE and or RFEE WILL. There is no day when the weight of SIN will prevent an individual from moving into a higher form of expression or heaven&#8221;.</p>
<p>That statement affirms my &#8220;<a href="http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/category/god-is-love-hell-is-not">God is Love : Hell Is Not</a>&#8221; concepts.</p>
<p>Each of determines our own hell on earth (can you say karma?) and Jesus came to show us the <strong>WAY</strong>. Jesus came to show us the <strong>TRUTH.</strong> And Jesus came to show us the <strong>LIFE</strong> that never, ever ends (but just transcends). Jesus did not die. </p>
<p><strong>Jesus IS ALIVE!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/47-jesus-did-not-die.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title># 46- A Changing View Of God</title>
		<link>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/46-a-changing-view-of-god.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/46-a-changing-view-of-god.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/46-a-changing-view-of-god.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no questioning the fact- Jesus was a man: a male. And He called God Abba Father, but God certainly isn&#8217;t a man- male! When the Bible was written, men were dominant, they ruled the roost, and God couldn&#8217;t be anything but a MALE according to the Biblical authors. This isn&#8217;t deep logic, nor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no questioning the fact- <strong>Jesus was a man</strong>: a male. And He called God <strong>Abba Father</strong>, but God certainly isn&#8217;t a man- male! When the Bible was written, men were dominant, they ruled the roost, and God couldn&#8217;t be anything but a<em> MALE</em> according to the Biblical authors. This isn&#8217;t deep logic, nor does it need intense investigation. <span id="more-974"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense#article--></p>
<p>Saying that God is a man or male is absurd to say the least though there are many that both consciously and unconsciously believe such. Sex is the characteristic of we humans we have a need of procreation and growth. But God has no such needs (<em>He, She, It, Thou</em>) as He exists eternally in a realm wherein there is no sexual differentiation.</p>
<p>God has no gender!</p>
<p>That said, you are now beginning to see changes in how humanhood and society not only <strong>SEES</strong> God, but the <strong>WORDS</strong> used to describe this God. I can&#8217;t see myself changes the &#8220;<strong>he</strong>&#8221; in the God I know, but neither do I object to how those who view and describe God differently. And it&#8217;s happening faster than you know.</p>
<p>In 1992 the Methodist Church of Great Britain concluded that the use of &#8220;<strong>female imagery</strong>&#8221; is compatible with faithfulness to the Scriptures. More and more Bible translations are using <em>inclusive language</em>. Fatherhood verbage will be replaced by statements about God&#8217;s love for mankind. And there will be a focus on the <em>filial relationships</em> of Jesus to God rather than on His sonship.</p>
<p>One needs to know where to <em>draw the line</em> and I&#8217;d suggest this is not the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/46-a-changing-view-of-god.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title># 45- Blaming Adam &amp; Eve?</title>
		<link>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/45-blaming-adam-eve.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/45-blaming-adam-eve.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/45-blaming-adam-eve.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The church loves to blame original sin on Eve, who tempted Adam, who passed his blood line down to me. Say what? I&#8217;ve already mentioned the fact that if I believe in anything, I must follow Matthew Fox and his &#8220;original blessing&#8221; concept. Of course all Bible-believing Christians blame our mess on Satan, the Devil, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The church loves to blame <strong>original sin </strong>on Eve, who tempted Adam, who passed his blood line down to me. Say what? I&#8217;ve already mentioned the fact that if I believe in anything, I must follow <em>Matthew Fox</em> and his &#8220;<strong>original blessing</strong>&#8221; concept. Of course all Bible-believing Christians blame our mess on Satan, the Devil, the serpent. But, I really do need to ask the obvious question. How can any of this make sense when Adam and Eve are <strong>UNHISTORICAL</strong>? <span id="more-973"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense#article--></p>
<p>You do know that the Genesis story is a <strong>myth</strong> right?  <img src='http://www.lrchouston.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Neither <strong>CNN</strong>, nor <em>FOXNews</em> was there to give us accurate reporting. And saying that it was a myth doesn&#8217;t mean we throw it all out. Myths carry <strong>truths </strong>which are important to our understanding of self and society. Thus the <strong>origin of evil </strong>cannot be explained by original sin that started with Adam and Eve who did not exist and were not historical, material <strong>homo sapiens</strong>.</p>
<p>Thus there was no need to make an idol out of Mary, develop the immaculate conception, or annuncion theories to justify the &#8220;original sin&#8221; theory. Evolutionists have made logical sense (maybe not spiritual) as they contend since there was no primal man, there could not be a primal sin. Hmmmm.</p>
<p>So, where in the <strong>hell </strong>(metaphorically speaking) does that leave us?</p>
<p>Maybe we&#8217;re stuck with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_Brunner">Emil Brunner&#8217;s</a> comment that, &#8220;We cannot go further beyond this myth of Adam and Eve,&#8221; Somehow I just don&#8217;t want to leave it there!</p>
<p>We need to <strong>blame our pain </strong>on someone!</p>
<p>Maybe we could just simply say that because man is a &#8220;<strong>moral being</strong>&#8220;, he is capable of both good an evil. Maybe because man is <em>conscious of his consciousness</em>, he can choose to be and do whatever he wants which includes both good and bad actions. Maybe there&#8217;s no one to blame but <strong>ourselves</strong>, but then in today&#8217;s post modern society that just doesn&#8217;t seem <em>politically correct</em> does it!</p>
<p>It was so much easier when I just accepted my early doctrinal instruction and didn&#8217;t think!  <img src='http://www.lrchouston.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/45-blaming-adam-eve.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title># 44- Not By Proper Names!</title>
		<link>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/44-not-by-proper-names.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/44-not-by-proper-names.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/44-not-by-proper-names.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are transformed, we are energized, and we are saved NOT by any proper name, not even by the English names Jesus and Christ! Put &#8216;em together, separate &#8216;em, or put a comma between them and it&#8217;s all the same. We are in fact saved by the SPIRIT of Jesus, the Christ. God, the Father, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are <em>transformed</em>, we are energized, and we are <em>saved </em><strong>NOT</strong> by any proper name, not even by the <strong>English</strong> names Jesus and Christ! Put &#8216;em together, separate &#8216;em, or put a comma between them and it&#8217;s all the same. We are in fact saved by the<strong> SPIRIT </strong>of Jesus, the Christ. God, the Father, the Spirit was <strong>IN </strong>Christ reconciling Himself to the world. <span id="more-972"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense#article--></p>
<p>Jesus is the <em>heart of Christianity</em>!<br />
And&#8230;..<br />
Jesus is the<em> heart of the relationship </em>between <strong>ALL</strong> men and God.</p>
<p>Meaning&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Christ is not only the <strong>HEAD</strong> of the church but of <strong>ALL</strong> mankind!</p>
<p>It was <strong>IN </strong>this one person, this human from Nazareth, this Jew from Israel, this person who was both &#8220;<strong>Man for God</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>Man for others</strong>&#8221; who became so filled with the Spirit that He represents the <strong>truth </strong>about every man. Everyone!</p>
<p>All will be eventually be saved in that fourth dimension thanks to what Jesus did on the cross for ALL mankind! His <strong>Spirit</strong> is alive today and forever more. His Spirit is all in all and to those that neither saw nor heard the name (<a href="http://theologytoday.ptsem.edu/jul1962/v19-2-article2.htm">Christomonism</a>) will see Him in nature, history, and life regardless of how remote that location might be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/44-not-by-proper-names.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title># 43- Practical Inspiration</title>
		<link>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/43-practical-inspiration.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/43-practical-inspiration.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/43-practical-inspiration.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the msot over-worked Scriptures by fundamentalists is II Timothy 3:16. So what does INSPIRATION mean anyway? The word inspiration comes by way of the Latin wherein the King James translations of the Greek word Î¸ÎµÎ¿Ï€Î½ÎµÏ…ÏƒÏ„Î¿Ï‚ (theopneustos) means literally &#8220;God-breathed&#8220;. Fundamentalism take that to mean something akin to &#8220;automatic writing&#8220;, in that the writers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the msot over-worked Scriptures by fundamentalists is <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=II%20Timothy%203:16&#038;version=9">II Timothy 3:16</a>. So what does <strong>INSPIRATION</strong> mean anyway? The <em>word inspiration </em>comes by way of the Latin wherein the <strong>King James</strong> translations of the Greek word Î¸ÎµÎ¿Ï€Î½ÎµÏ…ÏƒÏ„Î¿Ï‚ (theopneustos) means literally &#8220;<em>God-breathed</em>&#8220;. <em>Fundamentalism </em>take that to mean something akin to &#8220;<strong>automatic writing</strong>&#8220;, in that the writers of the Bible had no will nor personality of their own, but were only putting on paper what God spoke to them. I don&#8217;t think so!  <span id="more-971"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense#article--></p>
<p>First of all it depends upon which ancient &#8220;<em>text</em>&#8221; wer&#8217;re using, which language, or which translation. Earlier translations read, &#8220;All Scripture <strong>that</strong> is inspired&#8221;. Change one word and you have an entirely different meaning my friend.</p>
<p>One cannot simply remove the human factors that go into the writing of the Bible which is a<strong> library</strong> of books, not ONE book. The Bible is written in many genres, by differing personalities, over thousands of years, to specific communities (Jewish and Christian primarily).</p>
<p>What needs to be considered is: who did the writing, for what period of time, under what conditions, and what the importance was for each writer. As <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Priesthood-Examined-Richard-Hanson/dp/0718824008">Dr. R.P.C. Hanson</a> said it, &#8220;The religious concept of inspiration is no longer tenable and that in its place we should speak of the Bible as <strong>unique</strong> precisely because it gives us the <em>formative,</em> hence the <em>normative</em>, account of what Christianity, as a faith in God, professes to be&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now, I can work with that and so can a lot of other people who need to know about God, Jesus, and the <strong>WAY</strong> wiithout hyper-literal religious concepts getting in the way of the Spirit! The Bible tells me and others how <em>ancient societies</em> reponded to what they &#8220;<em>believed</em>&#8221; to be God&#8217;s relationship to them in a given part of the world, and at specific times.</p>
<p>And the rubber meets the road when you cna answer that for <strong>YOURSELF. TODAY!</strong>   <img src='http://www.lrchouston.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/43-practical-inspiration.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title># 42- There Is No &#8220;Back-Up&#8221; Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/there-is-no-back-up-plan.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/there-is-no-back-up-plan.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/there-is-no-back-up-plan.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The church loudly proclaims that God is omnipotent! And then it says that 80% of God&#8217;s plan is a failure. How does that work? Tell me. How in the HELL (metaphorical language you know) does that work? My answer is- it doesn&#8217;t! The traditional thinking has been that JUSTICE is a back up plan in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The church loudly proclaims that God is <strong>omnipotent</strong>! And then it says that <strong>80%</strong> of God&#8217;s plan is a <strong>failure</strong>. How does that work? Tell me. How in the <a href="http://godislovehellisnot.com/">HELL</a> (<em>metaphorical language </em>you know) does that work? My answer is- it doesn&#8217;t! The traditional thinking has been that <strong>JUSTICE</strong> is a back up plan in the event that <strong>LOVE</strong> isn&#8217;t capable of doing it&#8217;s job. Come on mankind, get real. God is also omniscient. He<strong> SAW </strong>before He <strong>DID.</strong> Love wins! <span id="more-970"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense#article--></p>
<p>God needs a back up plan? How foolish.</p>
<p>Justice is no substitute for love. It&#8217;s not the fall-back which comes into operation when the other hasa failed to be effective. God falls back on <strong>JUSTICE </strong>when His plan of <strong>LOVE </strong>fails?  <em>John Baillie </em>(1886-1960) was a Scottish theologian, a Church of Scotland minister and he put forth one of the more common sense statements in his book, <strong>And the Life Everlasting</strong>.</p>
<p>Quoting from page 244 of that book, &#8220;It is like saying that a state which was obliged to keep half it&#8217;s citizens <strong>perpetually in prison </strong>would be as ideal a fatherland as one in which complete absence of crime kept the prisons perpetually empty- provided only that the penal laws were administered with equal  justice in the two cases.&#8221;</p>
<p>God has no power but the power of Love.</p>
<p>Quoting <strong>John A. T. Robinson</strong>, &#8220;God has no purpose other than the purpose of love, and no nature other than the nature of love. If that fails, God fails. Justice has no second line of defence; it has <strong>no power</strong> of it&#8217;s own.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s but <strong>ONE PLAN </strong>and Jesus has (past tense) fulfilled it for <strong>ALL</strong>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/there-is-no-back-up-plan.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title># 41- God Is Still Revealing!</title>
		<link>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/41-god-is-still-revealing.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/41-god-is-still-revealing.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 05:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/41-god-is-still-revealing.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re not coming from LRCHouston- Sept. 10th, it might be helpful to start there, as this is more or less a follow up from there. Martin Luther changed a whole lot of the religious landscape with his reformational spirit. Few are aware that he not only wrote the Bible in German, took on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re not coming from <a href="http://www.lrchouston.com/">LRCHouston- Sept. 10th</a>, it might be helpful to start there, as this is more or less a follow up from there.</p>
<p><strong>Martin Luther </strong>changed a whole lot of the religious landscape with his reformational spirit. Few are aware that he not only wrote the Bible in German, took on the Catholic church and it&#8217;s &#8220;<em>indulgences</em>&#8220;, but also changed the books of the Bible. Say what? Can you do that? He did, but then he changed that too. I&#8217;m fine with the New Testament canon being closed. I mean, who am<strong> I</strong> to question that? But, the books of the New Testament are not the <strong>sole revelation </strong>of God, any more than the historical or living Christ is. <span id="more-969"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense#article--></p>
<p>Where is it that we can <strong>CONFINE </strong>God to? Tell me! Where?</p>
<p>Omnipresence is just that; the ability to be<strong> present </strong>in <strong>every place</strong> at any, and/or <strong>every</strong>, time; unbounded or universal presence. So, God wasn&#8217;t at some point &#8220;back then&#8221;. God is <strong>NOW</strong> and He is forever <strong>NOW</strong>. God has spoken, God is speaking, and God will forever be speaking, whether we listen or not.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=I%20Peter%202:6&#038;version=9">I Peter 2:6</a> tells us that Jesus is the corner stone and the greatest example of <strong>whom God IS</strong>; however, where the name of Jesus has never been heard, God&#8217;s there nonetheless. And I am <strong>not </strong>going to sell God short and say that He&#8217;s <strong>not </strong>capable outside of Jesus, to care for His creation.</p>
<p>Many do.</p>
<p>God has <strong>not </strong>separated Himself from <strong>ANY</strong> of His creation and <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%208:38-39;&#038;version=9;">Romans 8:38,39</a> reminds us of that. And, as <em>Norman Pittenger </em>wrote, &#8220;The early church fathers in the Patristic age, recognized the work of the &#8220;Logos&#8221; throughout the cosmos, human history, and every child of God&#8221;. The world was made by the <strong>Logos</strong> and thus the incarnation is in <strong>ALL</strong> things.</p>
<p>I know that&#8217;s a bit deep for some, but while Jesus was the manifested <strong>incarnation</strong> of God, the incarnation is still with us, everywhere we look. God is not the <em>ruthless moralist </em>that many denominations have painted Him to be. <strong>Moral</strong>? No doubt! <strong>Ruthless</strong>? No way! The remedial aspect of the atonement (because of sin) is secondary for me. Or as I often put things, overcoming sin is a good place to begin, but a lousy place to end. The chief benefit of the atonement is bringing men into <strong>relationship</strong> with God.</p>
<p>God is omnipresence and God is &#8220;still&#8221; speaking, loving, <strong>revealing</strong>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/41-god-is-still-revealing.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title># 40- God Isn&#8217;t A Puppeteer!</title>
		<link>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/40-god-isnt-a-puppeteer.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/40-god-isnt-a-puppeteer.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 02:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/40-god-isnt-a-puppeteer.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not all said and done. The deal is not over. Man is not a static automaton. I&#8217;m amazed at how some people take the election doctrine so far as to totally abrogate any free will of man. God is not &#8220;up there&#8221; pulling our strings and making us behave. If He were, He&#8217;s sure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not all said and done. The deal is not over.  Man is not a static automaton. I&#8217;m amazed at how some people take the <strong>election doctrine</strong> so far as to totally abrogate any <strong>free will</strong> of man. God is not &#8220;<em>up there</em>&#8221; pulling our strings and making us behave. If He were, He&#8217;s sure not doing a very good job of it. Man is a &#8220;<em>becoming human being</em>&#8221; and God is right there with us all the way, encouraging us with His unlimited love. <span id="more-968"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense#article--></p>
<p>God is not a dictator. Instead of <strong>divine dictation</strong>, God is luring, wooing, enticing, inviting, and constantly whispering to us what we can be! I can respond to that! In fact, <strong>I AM!</strong></p>
<p>God is not the &#8220;<strong>unmoved mover</strong>&#8221; that many theologians and philosophers picture. God is relational. He created us under the <em>Edenic covenant</em> to have fellowship. It&#8217;s hard to grasp, but God wants to commune, talk, have conversation with, and think through us, each and every day. Each and every one of us makes a difference to God. You do! I do! We all do!</p>
<p>What we have to do to comprehend that is to slow down and<em> listen</em>!</p>
<p>The Houston bumper sticker that says &#8220;<strong>God listens</strong>&#8221; is but half of the picture. He&#8217;s also talking. The question really is, are <strong>YOU </strong>listening? And if you can say yes, then the follow up question is are you responding? You need to because God&#8217;s not going to <em>yank your chain</em> every hour to make sure you know who&#8217;s boss.</p>
<p>He already knows that!  <img src='http://www.lrchouston.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/40-god-isnt-a-puppeteer.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title># 39- Salvation Isn&#8217;t The End Game!</title>
		<link>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/39-salvation-isnt-the-end-game.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/39-salvation-isnt-the-end-game.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 05:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/39-salvation-isnt-the-end-game.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you didn&#8217;t come from the August 23rd post at LRC Houston entitled Christology Trumps Soteriology (salvation), then you might want to go back and read that as this commentary is basically a follow up from that thread. Let me get two points out of the way. First, we are ALL sinners- all of mankind. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you didn&#8217;t come from the <strong>August 23rd</strong> post at <a href="http://www.lrchouston.com/">LRC Houston</a> entitled Christology Trumps Soteriology (salvation), then you might want to go back and read that as this commentary is basically a follow up from that thread. Let me get two points out of the way. First, <strong>we are ALL sinners</strong>- all of mankind. It&#8217;s just in the water we drink, the food we eat, and the air we breathe. Meaning, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s in the blood. Second, the life and acts of Jesus, the Christ was an effectual demonstration of salvation for <strong>ALL </strong>men. But, unlike most in the fundamentalist camp, and others, the incarnation for me is so much more than a salvistic<strong> golden parachute</strong>. <span id="more-967"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense#article--></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve lost sight of the <strong>bigger picture </strong>that Jesus came to proclaim!</p>
<p>Can you say <strong>KINGDOM</strong>?   <img src='http://www.lrchouston.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We can now <em>more fully participate</em> in the <strong>divine life</strong> because of His life that He demonstrated and lived completely. For those that will pay attention, Jesus offered us a whole <strong>new level of living</strong>, a new relationship with God, that would be easier to surrender to and walk in faith. As <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3818/is_199710/ai_n8782625">Norman Pittenger</a> put it, &#8220;The soteriological pre-condition for christology is broader and wider than much of our recent Christian theology would imply.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s hitting the nail square on the head with the hammer.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get past the point that we&#8217;re all sinners! Come on! If anything is obvious that is, but to camp in that paradigm can get depressing. We are estranged from God. No doubts here. But, what&#8217;s the <strong>divine purpose of living </strong>anyway? Is it to repent everyday, get saved every day (can you do that?), and wallow in our sin nature? Listen, even as sinners, man was yet created in the image of God, and yet while sinners God loved us. I know this riles the self-righteous, but God&#8217;s arms are around the entire world!</p>
<p>There is no place God has not left Himself a witness! No place!</p>
<p>Another way of putting it is that this is an <strong>incarnational </strong>world! God is at work everywhere, in every culture, every &#8220;other&#8221; religion, and in the <em>Malaysian forests</em> where no civilized man has yet visited. There are such places. We know because we keep discovering them.</p>
<p>Salvation is just one of those &#8220;<strong>markers</strong>&#8221; along the journey of life. Almost all religions have some form of salvistic paradigm. We&#8217;ve got that. Now on with life, living the Kingdom, and being living epistles. The game is not over (soteriology), and the game hasn&#8217;t just begun. The <strong>GAME IS ON</strong> and has been <strong>ON</strong> for millions of years. Let&#8217;s wake up, put a helmet on, and get in there for a few plays.</p>
<p>Now!</p>
<p>Whatcha say?  <img src='http://www.lrchouston.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/39-salvation-isnt-the-end-game.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title># 38- Religion Need Not Be Mediated!</title>
		<link>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/38-religion-need-not-be-mediated.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/38-religion-need-not-be-mediated.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/38-religion-need-not-be-mediated.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am glad that I have moved from being a &#8220;pastor&#8221; of and institutional church to a &#8220;spiritual guide&#8221; of a local community of believers. I, me personally, no longer believe in the hierarchy that I found myself attached to for six decades. I don&#8217;t know what that means about the future, but I am [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that I have moved from being a &#8220;<em>pastor</em>&#8221; of and <strong>institutional church</strong> to a &#8220;<em>spiritual guide</em>&#8221; of a local <strong>community </strong>of believers. I, me personally, no longer believe in the hierarchy that I found myself attached to for six decades. I don&#8217;t know what that means about the future, but I am thinking that it is <strong>GOOD!. </strong>Only time will tell. However, the point of this <strong>38th </strong>theses being nailed to the internet airways (and not the church door as in the days of Luther), is that church has lost it&#8217;s way, and I&#8217;m not sure that it has the courage, interest, or resources to find it&#8217;s way back to Jesus! <span id="more-966"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense#article--></p>
<p>Jesus did not come to teach <strong>doctrine</strong>, nor was He a doctrinal teacher!</p>
<p>The church has misrepresented Him in this and many other things.</p>
<p>Jesus didn&#8217;t come to start and be the founder of a new religion- church! <strong>Posthumously</strong>, the church attributed things to Him that He never spoke of nor advocated. But, the church found it in their best interests to ascribe these things to Him though.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the core of this 38th theses. I can come into the presence of the Creator of the universe all by myself. I don&#8217;t need someone to lead me in a <strong>sinners prayer</strong> to find intimacy with God. I don&#8217;t need a <strong>MAN </strong>in a <strong>DRESS</strong> to put a wafer in my mouth to take communion. I don&#8217;t need a fancy small &#8220;<em>fits two</em>&#8221; box to tell my confessions to another that I might be forgiven.</p>
<p>In order to have a right relationship with God, I don&#8217;t need to go through an <em>infallible anyone</em> (can you say Pope?), read the right Scriptures, say the right words, accept and affirm the right belief system, join the right denomination, repeat the proper and orthodox creeds, or even pray in unknown tongues. I don&#8217;t need a<strong> MEDIATED </strong>spiritual, religious, church paradigm.</p>
<p>Blow that box to <strong>hell</strong>! Remember, that&#8217;s just a metaphor: don&#8217;t take it literally!</p>
<p>Now, while I don&#8217;t <strong>NEED</strong> (as in have to have), one cannot live outside <strong>COMMUNITY</strong>! Who&#8217;s yours?   <img src='http://www.lrchouston.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Want some really <strong>hard TRUTH?</strong>  <a href="http://www.spiritualliminalspace.com/">CLICK HERE</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lrchouston.com/archive/38-religion-need-not-be-mediated.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

